In Kousisis v. United States, No. 23-909, 605 U.S. __, 2025 WL 1459593 (May 22, 2025), the Supreme Court unanimously held that a defendant may be convicted under the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, even if the victim receives the full economic value of the bargain. Writing for the Court, Justice Barrett explained that the statute criminalizes schemes to obtain money or property through materially false pretenses, regardless of whether the victim suffers economic loss. The case involved Stamatios Kousisis and Alpha Painting and Construction Co., who secured state contracts from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) by falsely representing compliance with requirements to use disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs). Although Alpha completed the work to PennDOT’s standards, the defendants used a DBE as a pass-through entity and submitted false certifications to conceal the deception.
Rejecting the argument that economic harm is a necessary element of wire fraud, the Court affirmed that the statute’s plain text requires only a fraudulent scheme to obtain money or property. The opinion underscores that material misrepresentations can support a conviction under § 1343 even in the absence of financial loss. While Justice Gorsuch, concurring in part, warned that the ruling could criminalize “harmless lies” and depart from fraud’s historical requirement of injury, the majority responded that inducing a victim to part with property under false pretenses constitutes injury in itself. This recent case of interest marks a departure from the Court’s recent trend of narrowing the scope of federal fraud enforcement and signals a potential expansion in prosecutorial authority in future fraudulent inducement cases.
No information in this communication is intended to constitute specific legal advice. For specific legal advice, please contact an attorney, and if you have any such questions or would like more information about this issue, please contact William “Pat” Huttenbach at 713.752.8616, or email at phuttenbach@craincaton.com.
Thanks,
Pat
William “Pat” Huttenbach | Shareholder | Banking Litigation Crain Caton & James | Attorneys & Counselors
Five Houston Center | 1401 McKinney St., Suite 1700
Houston, TX 77010
Direct: 713.752.8616 | Fax: 713.658.1921 phuttenbach@craincaton.com | Download Vcard
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.