single-back single-back single-back
testimonial-back

It is a disconcerting reality when a third party appropriates a domain name that closely resembles, or outright mimics, your business’s trademark—this constitutes cybersquatting. The legal framework for cybersquatting litigation arises when an entity registers a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark, with the intention of exploiting the goodwill associated with that mark, often for the purpose of reselling the domain at an inflated price or misleading consumers.  The core of this action lies in demonstrating the third party’s “bad faith” in their registration and use of the domain name, juxtaposed against the rights afforded to the trademark holder.

To effectively pursue this matter, the Intellectual Property Practice Group may assemble a dedicated team that could include members from the Commercial Litigation Practice Group. This team would be tasked with seeking the transfer of the infringing domain, securing the cessation of the misleading site, and pursuing monetary damages and injunctive relief.

Crain Caton prepares for trial and, if necessary, appeal.  Our Intellectual Property Practice Group ensures the input from other litigators in the firm and from its appellate specialists to ensure the best presentation at any judicial level.

No News Found