When faced with allegations of false advertising, the federal Lanham Act serves as the basis for legal recourse. Depending on the nuances of the case at hand, the team at Crain Caton & James may engage expertise from both the Intellectual Property Practice Group and the Commercial Litigation Practice Group.
Our team will meticulously examine the statements in question, assessing their potential to sway consumer behavior, their truthfulness, the claimed damages, and their distribution in interstate lines. In the discovery phase, the team will compile evidence through depositions, written demands, and information from third parties.
The attorneys are fully equipped to present this evidence to the fact-finder, considering various remedies that may be sought, including lost profits, actual damages, statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and requests for permanent injunctions. It is our aim to approach each case with a commitment to achieving a prompt and just resolution.
Crain Caton prepares for trial and, if necessary, appeal. Our Intellectual Property Practice Group ensures the input from other litigators in the firm and from its appellate specialists to ensure the best presentation at any judicial level.
Areas of Focus
- AI Protection
- Appeal of Judgments Regarding Intellectual Property
- Copyright Litigation
- Cybersquatting Litigation
- False Advertising Litigation
- Foreign Patent Prosecution
- Foreign Trademark Prosecution
- Intellectual Property Assets in Family Hands
- Intellectual Property in Corporate Agreements
- Intellectual Property in Mergers & Acquisitions
- Intellectual Property Ownership from Employees & Independent Contractors
- Litigation With Intellectual Property
- Patent Administrative Challenges
- Patent Litigation
- State Trademark Prosecution
- Trade Secret Litigation
- Trade Secret Protection
- Trademark Administrative Challenges
- Trademark Litigation
- U.S. Copyright Protection
- U.S. Patent Prosecution
- U.S. Trademark Prosecution
